WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

No credit for partial answers, maggot! You've already embarrassed yourself by claiming the SCOTUS case was about fraud, go quote relevant filings showing the cases could reasonably bring fraud evidence and then show judges statements refusing to hear that evidence.

You're refusing to listen to evidence.

[–] 1 pt

Give me a quote from a case that proves they weren't allowed to bring evidence and I'll read it. Of course you won't though.

Because you aren't looking at the evidence I provided.