The SCOTUS throwing out the case brought up by over 18 state AGs LOL.
Edit: forgot to add a condescending "LOL" to the end of my sentence, too.
Given that the allegations Texas filed in the lawsuit where that Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin didn't follow the correct legal procedure when they changed their postal voting rules in light of COVID-19, what evidence would actually fit in to that filing? After all Texas clearly stated in their filing 'Whether "voters committed fraud" was not the "constitutional issue" in this case, according to Texas. Therefore, Texas declared that it did not need to "prove" fraud'
Or did you actually not have any clue what the case was about and thought it was about fraud? LOOOOOOOL
I still contend it was about fraud, especially if you read the documents they submitted to the court, yes.
Edit: also, we aren't even getting into the cases dismissed by Wisconsin, Nevada, Sydney Powell, etc.. You're going to have to write a thesis to dismiss all of that and keep the cognitive dissonance straight in your head at this rate.
What part of "The constitutional issue is not whether voters committed fraud" are you having trouble understanding?
Edit: also, we aren't even getting into the cases dismissed by Wisconsin, Nevada, Sydney Powell, etc.. You're going to have to write a thesis to dismiss all of that and keep the cognitive dissonance straight in your head at this rate
Isn't one of those the one where Giuliani told a judge "This is not a fraud case"? Looks like you can't find a single example of a case where fraud evidence could have been presented but wasn't allowed by a judge LOL.
The fucking case wasn't about correct fucking legal procedure, it was about following the CONSTITUTION in that the Executive branch at the state level has ZERO authority to change election law.
Take your disinfo and your "Hurr LAWL" shite and shove it, it's not working.
So... you agree that they weren't allowed to present evidence at the court because it was irrelevant to the case. I.E., as Texas' lawyer put it, "The constitutional issue is not whether voters committed fraud"
(post is archived)