>Affidavits aren't evidence
Sworn affidavits ARE evidence and your unwillingness to accept that eye witness testimony is evidence tells a story about you.
I've not seen any evidence that the hidden suitcases wheeled out and counted multiple times after the urinal overflowed had be debunked. But, I didn't bring that strawman into the conversation, did I? Nice safe place to try to fall back to.
>That's the problem with most of trumps "evidence". So then you agree that some of the evidence is legitimate.
I don't particularly care if Trump loses if it's proven that Biden won, but before I accept a Biden presidency, they are going to have to demonstrate that the corpse won it fair and sqare. Only retards and liars, at this point, can believe that until the evidence is properly addressed. It hasn't been. You know it hasn't been and your disingenuous protestations are nothing more than Democrat machine talking points.
How many replies and you still haven't posted any evidence. Amazing that you want to scrap an entire election, ignore of our democracy and constitution but you have zero evidence except say "affidavits".
I sent it somewhere... I don't see it in this thread. It's Navarro's report. You can find it if you want to read it. You won't so why bother?
I don't want to scrap an election. I want to have a fair and honest election, something that apparently escapes your comprehension.
>zero evidence except...
So you agree there's evidence?
I said affidavits can be dismissed by courts. Then they are invalid as evidence. I can swear an affidavit that clint eastwood shot JFK. From your understanding of an affidavit, clint eastwood should be arrested and put in jail for assassination of the president.
(post is archived)