Your refusal to acknowledge it does not equate to my inability to provide it.
You dodged the question.
The election was a fraud. Prove me wrong.
You don't understand what burden of proof is. You're the one making the claim, it's up to you to prove it. This is the reason 55 (probably more now) cases were thrown out. A claim like "they cannot count Biden's votes in that time" is pointless without proof. Also, asking the other side for evidence to prove your claim is against the entire legal system.
Imagine you could pick up random people and charge them with unsolved murders and you just ask them to provide evidence they didn't do it. If they can't, they're guilty. Burden of proof is on you
They have never looked at the proof. Not one time. The representatives of the people have and they've asked the courts to hear the evidence. The courts simply will not do it. They will not touch the overwhelming evidence.
Why are they afraid to address the available evidence?
Answer this one question. Do you personally claim that there is no evidence? If you won't answer that simple question, there's nowhere for this conversation to go.
>Answer this one question. Do you personally claim that there is no evidence? If you won't answer that simple question, there's nowhere for this conversation to go.
Didn't think so.
Did you even look at this?
https://bannonswarroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The-Immaculate-Deception-12.15.20-1.pdf
They did look at the evidence. It was deemed to be bullshit when cross examined in court or wasn't even valid evidence before it made it to court.
And yes, i claimed there is no evidence. I asked you to provide some and you couldn't. Neither could the presidents legal team
(post is archived)