I would go with the statistical data demonstrating that it is physically impossible to load as many votes as Biden got in a time frame using existing equipment.
Actually, the preponderance of evidence is enough, but that is the one thing that I think is irrefutable.
What single piece of evidence would you use to say that all 50 state election certifications are pristine and without doubt to the degree that not a single court in the land will even look at that preponderance of evidence and keeps falling back to procedural escapes to avoid hearing the evidence?
The burden of proof is on you. You haven't provided any specific evidence.
Your refusal to acknowledge it does not equate to my inability to provide it.
You dodged the question.
The election was a fraud. Prove me wrong.
You don't understand what burden of proof is. You're the one making the claim, it's up to you to prove it. This is the reason 55 (probably more now) cases were thrown out. A claim like "they cannot count Biden's votes in that time" is pointless without proof. Also, asking the other side for evidence to prove your claim is against the entire legal system.
Imagine you could pick up random people and charge them with unsolved murders and you just ask them to provide evidence they didn't do it. If they can't, they're guilty. Burden of proof is on you
(post is archived)