The burden of proof is on you. You haven't provided any specific evidence.
Your refusal to acknowledge it does not equate to my inability to provide it.
You dodged the question.
The election was a fraud. Prove me wrong.
You don't understand what burden of proof is. You're the one making the claim, it's up to you to prove it. This is the reason 55 (probably more now) cases were thrown out. A claim like "they cannot count Biden's votes in that time" is pointless without proof. Also, asking the other side for evidence to prove your claim is against the entire legal system.
Imagine you could pick up random people and charge them with unsolved murders and you just ask them to provide evidence they didn't do it. If they can't, they're guilty. Burden of proof is on you
They have never looked at the proof. Not one time. The representatives of the people have and they've asked the courts to hear the evidence. The courts simply will not do it. They will not touch the overwhelming evidence.
Why are they afraid to address the available evidence?
Answer this one question. Do you personally claim that there is no evidence? If you won't answer that simple question, there's nowhere for this conversation to go.
(post is archived)