$1,000,000 cash can fit in a briefcase. The fact people act like entire SUITCASES of ballots from the video couldn't add up to the 130k+ vote spike is rediculous.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (16).

[–] • 0 pt

$1m in $100 bills is 10,000 bills.
5 bills can fit in the space of roughly one 8.5" x 11" sheet of paper
A ream of paper (500 sheets) stacks 2.5 inches high. Call it 3" since bills are slightly thicker.
In the space of one ream of paper, you can fit 2,500 bills, or $250,000.
A decent sized briefacase could carry 2 reams of paper, or $500,000.
Account for the differences between paper and cash, and you could probably stretch that to $600k or even $750. But $1m would be pushing it except for an unusually large briefcase.

Now lets do the math on ballots, since the dumb comparison with money is out of they way.

Most ballots are on regular-sized letter paper. A carton of paper is 10 reams of 500 sheets each, or 5,000 sheets.
A carton of 5,000 sheets of paper is approximately 17" x 11" x 12.5" and weighs some 44 pounds.
130,000 sheets would require 26 cartons and weigh 1,144 pounds.

So no, suitcases would not add up to 130k. However, they were pulling out what appeared to be more like road cases. Something like a Pelican BX135 (closest I could find on a quick search that looked similar) has an interior volume of 36.8" × 12.3" × 13.2", which could hold approximately 10,000 or so ballots (minimum), meaning they would need 13 of such cases.

But if you run each ballot through twice, you only need 6.5 cases of ballots. Run them through 3x each, just over 4 cases. Setup multiple people to just take a scanned ballot from one machine and put it in another, (and another after that) and you can get through that fairly quickly. Now the ability to create 130,000 votes seems a lot harder to hand-wave away as a "conspiracy theory."

In short, stop running with your Q-tard bullshit (like all the BOOM/POW/KRAKEN/HAPPENING garbage you kept shitting up Voat with) and actually do the legwork to figure out if what you're saying even makes sense.

Presenting evidence like I just showed you how to do makes your argument much more plausible. And it doesn't even require you to sound like a raving lunatic. Or perhaps that's what you've been trying to do for the past month? Come off as a crazy lunatic so the people making legitimate arguments seem crazy as well. A kike discredit-by-association tactic.

Tell me, OP, how many nukes does Israel have?

* $1m in $100 bills is 10,000 bills. * 5 bills can fit in the space of roughly one 8.5" x 11" sheet of paper * A ream of paper (500 sheets) stacks 2.5 inches high. Call it 3" since bills are slightly thicker. * In the space of one ream of paper, you can fit 2,500 bills, or $250,000. * A decent sized briefacase could carry 2 reams of paper, or $500,000. * Account for the differences between paper and cash, and you could probably stretch that to $600k or even $750. But $1m would be pushing it except for an unusually large briefcase. Now lets do the math on ballots, since the dumb comparison with money is out of they way. * Most ballots are on regular-sized letter paper. A carton of paper is 10 reams of 500 sheets each, or 5,000 sheets. * A carton of 5,000 sheets of paper is approximately 17" x 11" x 12.5" and weighs some 44 pounds. * 130,000 sheets would require 26 cartons and weigh 1,144 pounds. So no, suitcases would not add up to 130k. However, they were pulling out what appeared to be more like road cases. Something like a Pelican BX135 (closest I could find on a quick search that looked similar) has an interior volume of 36.8" × 12.3" × 13.2", which could hold approximately 10,000 or so ballots (minimum), meaning they would need 13 of such cases. But if you run each ballot through twice, you only need 6.5 cases of ballots. Run them through 3x each, just over 4 cases. Setup multiple people to just take a scanned ballot from one machine and put it in another, (and another after that) and you can get through that fairly quickly. Now the ability to create 130,000 votes seems a lot harder to hand-wave away as a "conspiracy theory." In short, stop running with your Q-tard bullshit (like all the BOOM/POW/KRAKEN/HAPPENING garbage you kept shitting up Voat with) and actually do the legwork to figure out if what you're saying even makes sense. Presenting evidence like I just showed you how to do makes your argument much more plausible. And it doesn't even require you to sound like a raving lunatic. Or perhaps that's what you've been trying to do for the past month? Come off as a crazy lunatic so the people making legitimate arguments seem crazy as well. A kike discredit-by-association tactic. Tell me, OP, how many nukes does Israel have?

link

[–] • 0 pt

Better, personally I’ve found 650,000 to 750,000 the average, less if they are more used and wrinkled. Really ghetto bills you may be as low as 400,000. Also depends on the suitcase, those fancy linings suck, dividers suck, big old 1970s metal samsonite ones with fresh bills, you may hit 1 mil.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

Voat: 1,000 users, maybe 10,000 impressions.

4chan, Facebook & Twitter: millions of users, 10's of millions of impressions.

I think you confuse objective reality with reach.

parent
link