The only two things in question about the photo is whether the man was a farmer or not (he probably was as were most Cubans during that time) and if he was executed for not playing ball with Castro's gov or being a Batista loyalist (is there anything more than a semantic difference there?).
The point of the pic is that communists are 100% not out for the worker but out for tyrannical, authoritarian power. And if that means summarily executing the very people you claim to represent, so be it. It's an insidious evil that we are going to have to confront as a nation very soon. We are in the middle of a socialist revolution (power grab) as I type.
Your assumptions are no better than the fact checkers.
The converse is true too, their (((fact checking))) is no better than my assumptions. And the fact that's not in doubt is undeniable, communists are evil. Sorry, if you don't like that. It's a fact free world my friend, the only rules are propaganda. The other side is not afraid of that, I won't be either.
It's rather disingenuous to infer that I'm a communist sympathizer for merely having pointed out your failed logic. There is NO evidence the guy was a farmer, anymore than he was a murderer. Your assumptions dont count.
My take away is that an extrajudicial murder occurred because of a regime change.
If you were given a choice to farm or die while a gun was held to your head, which would you choose?
(post is archived)