He’s not a plaintiff, but a defendant in the case. The title of this post is completely wrong.
Looks like a suit to force Pences response, via article 2...?
exactly, I don't think op did it on purpose, as generally he posts interesting shit, but reading legal documents and noticing anomalies is not every nigger faggots forte.
Oh. Well then I guess I'll trust the plan? :)
In not a lawfag, this is strange. Why is Pence shown as a plaintiff along with the Whitmore types? Any lawfags here to help shed some,light on this?
He's not, that is the end of the plaintiffs. He is the #1 defendant. Continue reading the document.
due to plaintiffs being listed before defendants .... Pence is defendant #1
(post is archived)