Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

445

Of course he's talking about how he's going to personally pay for it

Not about how making somebody else pay for it, a somebody else that turns out to be us and our grand kids ultimately, paying to no end to "fix" the mess the goldmans and the likes are responsible for in the first place

...

Of course he's talking about how he's going to personally pay for it Not about how making somebody else pay for it, a somebody else that turns out to be us and our grand kids ultimately, paying to no end to "fix" the mess the goldmans and the likes are responsible for in the first place ...

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (9).
[–] • 1 pt

As technology advances it may happen.

How can we expect people to work when all work is done by machines and computers?

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

The butlerian jihad comes to mind

https://dune.fandom.com/wiki/Butlerian_Jihad

>In his six original Dune novels Frank Herbert mentions few details of the Butlerian Jihad. The lesson taken by the human descendents of this war is that mankind's laziness and ingenuity can be its downfall.

https://youtu.be/z7FcJwg6OkA?t=69

>Another, more subtle justification for the Butlerian Jihad is also found in Frank Herbert's original novels, specifically Heidegger's thesis that the use of technology trains humans to think like machines. The problem is that machines are deterministic; thus, training people to be machines is self-limiting. Herbert seemed to think that to be human is to be essentially 'open-ended', capable of undiscovered, indeterminate evolution, both personally and as a species.

[–] • 1 pt

Good comparison.

Practically speaking, if we have autonomous semi-trucks for instance. The people who used to drive trucks aren't going to evolve beyond that line of work. They will be out of work.

[–] • 1 pt

And they'll be told; "Learn to code"