did you read the article? do you understand that their "proof" is just Fox News website showing reporting correction... which could be a Fox decision desk fixing a human error or just a county clerical error (like the 130,000 or 6,000 that were clerical error) from the person managing the website. It's not the official vote totals, nor is it the end-of-day/end-of-dump summary total that the SoS tells the media (and those can be initially off too, since in county-up systems counties might be reporting results to their district center all at once or piecemeal and that info doesn't make its way up to the state). This is just gateway pundit doing their regular thing--lying to you in the headline while giving you nothing that resembles it in the details.
Who is paying you to shill here?
your fat cunty mother
More insults. All it takes is a simple question and you show your true colors.
The reason I asked before was that statement was somewhat different than your other statements, in that it had a completely different tone - like it was written by another person.
Are you still holding on to the fallacy that you have the suspicious behavior tag because "you ignored a mod?"
Do you kiss your dad with that dirty mouth of yours?
(post is archived)