I'd be really cautious about accepting how much they are going to do with this info.

This is from DHS, but how many times have you heard of them arresting someone? Plus, the CISA source they are all citing is from CISA... who is serious issues, right now. And the DISA chief was replaced like yesterday. They are playing games with each other so we will just get some trickle of information as a result, not because they actually want anyone to know what they are up to.

It does appear to be true, though. But many crimes are still proven that continue to go unpunished.

https://twitter.com/webofslime/status/1324466171974836224

https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/reporters-notebook-jason-miller/2020/11/cia-cloud-program-awarded-cisa-cyber-program-under-protest/

https://mytechdecisions.com/network-security/cisa-no-us-election-security-incidents-so-far/

https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/403148-dhs-chief-calls-on-election-officials-in-all-50-states-to-have

https://www.airforcemag.com/senate-confirms-skinner-as-next-disa-director/

https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2020-10/OIG-21-01-Oct20.pdf

https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/electionofficials/vbm/Signature_Verification_Cure_Process.pdf

I'd be really cautious about accepting how much they are going to do with this info.

Allow me to reiterate caution.

These measures will make it very easy to verify if a ballot is authentic, or not. China cannot print ballots and then turn them in.

This is why so many extra ballots had to go out, so there were real ones that random people could fill out.

If a person fraudulently fills out someone else's ballot, these anti-counterfeiting measures do nothing, because they are using a real ballot for a fake vote.

This is why the fight is, ultimately, still up to the lawyers.

There is also no uniform anti-counterfeiting measure across all counties and cities. Literally every city in the country has a different ballot.

Personally, my vote was not counted. I've checked a number of times. That was a real ballot. The DHS measures do nothing to save my vote.

A watermark measure only solves one type of voter fraud. We have many types of voter fraud occurring.

same, searched searched searched, nothing even remotely resembling what this screenshot states.

https://twitter.com/webofslime/status/1324466171974836224

https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/reporters-notebook-jason-miller/2020/11/cia-cloud-program-awarded-cisa-cyber-program-under-protest/

https://mytechdecisions.com/network-security/cisa-no-us-election-security-incidents-so-far/

https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/403148-dhs-chief-calls-on-election-officials-in-all-50-states-to-have

https://www.airforcemag.com/senate-confirms-skinner-as-next-disa-director/

https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2020-10/OIG-21-01-Oct20.pdf

https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/electionofficials/vbm/Signature_Verification_Cure_Process.pdf

They will starve without a little hopium. Plus, they are increasingly frustrated with QRV and will be hitting up QStorm.

As usual, a common sense solution corrupted in the fine print. This is why I have a bit of skepticism about how they will use anti-counterfeiting measures. We all know what "anti" means to Moloch worshippers.

You realize it's all just people, right? It doesn't matter what arbitrary jurisdictional boundaries exist, they can be superceded by literally just a conversation between two people.

It can be used for the opposite of what was intended but DHS has SOP to verify ballots. I don't see where it has any requirements on how many, so you won't see me saying much to get behind DHS... Bush's special agency.

https://twitter.com/webofslime/status/1324466171974836224

https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/reporters-notebook-jason-miller/2020/11/cia-cloud-program-awarded-cisa-cyber-program-under-protest/

https://mytechdecisions.com/network-security/cisa-no-us-election-security-incidents-so-far/

https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/403148-dhs-chief-calls-on-election-officials-in-all-50-states-to-have

https://www.airforcemag.com/senate-confirms-skinner-as-next-disa-director/

https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2020-10/OIG-21-01-Oct20.pdf

https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/electionofficials/vbm/Signature_Verification_Cure_Process.pdf

Sure, buddy. My concern is that this type of investigation will be used for the opposite of its intent through selectively "curing." However, this is a list of sources for every claim I've stated. SOP is to check ballots. Is there anything else I can Google for you?

https://twitter.com/webofslime/status/1324466171974836224

https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/reporters-notebook-jason-miller/2020/11/cia-cloud-program-awarded-cisa-cyber-program-under-protest/

https://mytechdecisions.com/network-security/cisa-no-us-election-security-incidents-so-far/

https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/403148-dhs-chief-calls-on-election-officials-in-all-50-states-to-have

https://www.airforcemag.com/senate-confirms-skinner-as-next-disa-director/

https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2020-10/OIG-21-01-Oct20.pdf

https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/electionofficials/vbm/Signature_Verification_Cure_Process.pdf