Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

147

1

2

3

4

Minnesota had a 74.16% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 3,190,653 total votes now and 3,588,563 registered voters that's 88.9%. That's quite a bit higher

Wisconsin had a 68.33% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 3,240,459 total votes now and 3,684,726 registered voters that's 87.9%. That's a lot higher.

Michigan had a 64.59% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 5,424,717 total votes now and 8,127,040 registered voters, that's 66.7%. Nothing apparently strange here regarding the turnout.

Georgia had a 60% voter turnout in 2016, In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 4,847,706 total votes now and 7,233,584 registered voters, that's 67%. A bit higher.

North Carolina had a 64.57% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 94% counted, 5,387,467 total votes now and 7,361,219 registered voters, that's 73.2% with not even 99% of votes counted. That's quite a bit higher.

Arizona had a 56.35% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 88% counted, 2,870,292 total votes now and 4,281,152 registered voters, that's 67%, again with not even 99% of votes counted. That's quite a bit higher and it's gonna be higher even.

Nevada had a 57.09% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 75% counted, 1,168,857 total votes now and 1,821,356 total registered voters, that's 64.2%. Already a bit higher and it still has a quarter to go.

1 [amount of registered voters](https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/number-of-registered-voters-by-state) 2 [2016 voter turnout](https://www.statista.com/statistics/632113/2016-us-presidential-election-voter-turnout-by-state/) 3 [current amount of votes and](https://www.google.com/search?q=us+live+election+results&oq=us+live+ele&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i57j0i324j0i22i30l2j69i60j69i61j69i60.2255j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8) 4 [the website to put in the numbers and calculate percentages](https://percentagecalculator.net/) Minnesota had a 74.16% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 3,190,653 total votes now and 3,588,563 registered voters that's 88.9%. That's quite a bit higher Wisconsin had a 68.33% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 3,240,459 total votes now and 3,684,726 registered voters that's 87.9%. That's a lot higher. Michigan had a 64.59% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 5,424,717 total votes now and 8,127,040 registered voters, that's 66.7%. Nothing apparently strange here regarding the turnout. Georgia had a 60% voter turnout in 2016, In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 4,847,706 total votes now and 7,233,584 registered voters, that's 67%. A bit higher. North Carolina had a 64.57% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 94% counted, 5,387,467 total votes now and 7,361,219 registered voters, that's 73.2% with not even 99% of votes counted. That's quite a bit higher. Arizona had a 56.35% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 88% counted, 2,870,292 total votes now and 4,281,152 registered voters, that's 67%, again with not even 99% of votes counted. That's quite a bit higher and it's gonna be higher even. Nevada had a 57.09% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 75% counted, 1,168,857 total votes now and 1,821,356 total registered voters, that's 64.2%. Already a bit higher and it still has a quarter to go.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (40).
[–] • 1 pt

Oh, did that trigger a nerve. The problem you have is that our predictions are right.

On our election night Poalcast, we explained exactly what was going to happen, then watched it happen.

Maybe you should check it out.

One of the greatest political analysts was actually Hunter S Thompson. "A Generation of Swine" was prophetic, when written and elucidates a lot of factions in politics, today. If you want a proper, politically neutral point of view, this is a must read so that you have the exposition and context necessary to understand American politics, now.

The problem you have debating with me is that you are assuming I am of the same political mind as other users. In fact, if you read close enough, you will see that my point of view transcends "Right and Left" because both parties are inherently evil and I am more of a "Good versus Evil" kind of guy. A "Poaladin", if you will.

Seriously, read some of this closely:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Intelligence/comments/bacrym/mockingbird_x0/

Pay real close attention when you get to this picture:

https://pic8.co/sh/KXQAv7.png

Some people read closer than others.

https://pic8.co/sh/QVZOIr.png

Notice I have a lot more intelligence than you. I don't mean brain power. I mean computer power. My intelligence is reliable and I know that the Intelligence community is mostly geared towards spying and lying on each other. The dangerously stupid are just gullible enough to fall for lies not even meant for them.

[–] • 0 pt

hahahaha is this really your response to having your math skills exposed? you're not going to defend your use of multiplying percentage for 2020 with the 2016 numbers? you're not going to defend your lack of mention of same-day registration in several of those states?

[–] • 1 pt

What predictions have you made correctly? Do you record your predictions, like me? Can we see screenshots of your predictions.

Tell you what, let's compare.

You start by posting one prediction you've made that has come true, then I'll post one, then we'll all be able to see who has been right more.

[–] • 1 pt

You start by posting one prediction you've made that has come true

Don't hold your breath. Abigail is only using her script. lol

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not criticizing your "predictions" i'm criticizing your bad math skills

One prediction I made was that Biden would win Wisconsin. Your turn.