Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

461

1

2

3

4

Minnesota had a 74.16% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 3,190,653 total votes now and 3,588,563 registered voters that's 88.9%. That's quite a bit higher

Wisconsin had a 68.33% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 3,240,459 total votes now and 3,684,726 registered voters that's 87.9%. That's a lot higher.

Michigan had a 64.59% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 5,424,717 total votes now and 8,127,040 registered voters, that's 66.7%. Nothing apparently strange here regarding the turnout.

Georgia had a 60% voter turnout in 2016, In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 4,847,706 total votes now and 7,233,584 registered voters, that's 67%. A bit higher.

North Carolina had a 64.57% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 94% counted, 5,387,467 total votes now and 7,361,219 registered voters, that's 73.2% with not even 99% of votes counted. That's quite a bit higher.

Arizona had a 56.35% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 88% counted, 2,870,292 total votes now and 4,281,152 registered voters, that's 67%, again with not even 99% of votes counted. That's quite a bit higher and it's gonna be higher even.

Nevada had a 57.09% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 75% counted, 1,168,857 total votes now and 1,821,356 total registered voters, that's 64.2%. Already a bit higher and it still has a quarter to go.

1 [amount of registered voters](https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/number-of-registered-voters-by-state) 2 [2016 voter turnout](https://www.statista.com/statistics/632113/2016-us-presidential-election-voter-turnout-by-state/) 3 [current amount of votes and](https://www.google.com/search?q=us+live+election+results&oq=us+live+ele&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i57j0i324j0i22i30l2j69i60j69i61j69i60.2255j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8) 4 [the website to put in the numbers and calculate percentages](https://percentagecalculator.net/) Minnesota had a 74.16% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 3,190,653 total votes now and 3,588,563 registered voters that's 88.9%. That's quite a bit higher Wisconsin had a 68.33% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 3,240,459 total votes now and 3,684,726 registered voters that's 87.9%. That's a lot higher. Michigan had a 64.59% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 5,424,717 total votes now and 8,127,040 registered voters, that's 66.7%. Nothing apparently strange here regarding the turnout. Georgia had a 60% voter turnout in 2016, In 2020, with 99% of votes counted, 4,847,706 total votes now and 7,233,584 registered voters, that's 67%. A bit higher. North Carolina had a 64.57% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 94% counted, 5,387,467 total votes now and 7,361,219 registered voters, that's 73.2% with not even 99% of votes counted. That's quite a bit higher. Arizona had a 56.35% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 88% counted, 2,870,292 total votes now and 4,281,152 registered voters, that's 67%, again with not even 99% of votes counted. That's quite a bit higher and it's gonna be higher even. Nevada had a 57.09% voter turnout in 2016. In 2020, with 75% counted, 1,168,857 total votes now and 1,821,356 total registered voters, that's 64.2%. Already a bit higher and it still has a quarter to go.

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

Minnesota Little Mogadishu dems have been importing their voter base for decades.

[–] • 2 pts

Fun fact, Somalians are the most resistant to facial recognition technology, as they are all so interbred, they look the same even to the most advanced, current AIs.

[–] • 0 pt

"sketchy" = state Trump hasn't won

got it

[–] • 2 pts

Leave the political analysis to the adults who have gotten it right every year despite MSM failures. Notice the numbers are just numbers. I avoided editorializing but you can't help yourself.

[–] • 0 pt

maybe if you weren't a fucking idiot who didn't use the same denominator in all your calculations from 2016 to 2020

newsflash: populations of eligible voters change because populations change and young people grow older

[–] • 1 pt

Oh, did that trigger a nerve. The problem you have is that our predictions are right.

On our election night Poalcast, we explained exactly what was going to happen, then watched it happen.

Maybe you should check it out.

One of the greatest political analysts was actually Hunter S Thompson. "A Generation of Swine" was prophetic, when written and elucidates a lot of factions in politics, today. If you want a proper, politically neutral point of view, this is a must read so that you have the exposition and context necessary to understand American politics, now.

The problem you have debating with me is that you are assuming I am of the same political mind as other users. In fact, if you read close enough, you will see that my point of view transcends "Right and Left" because both parties are inherently evil and I am more of a "Good versus Evil" kind of guy. A "Poaladin", if you will.

Seriously, read some of this closely:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Intelligence/comments/bacrym/mockingbird_x0/

Pay real close attention when you get to this picture:

https://pic8.co/sh/KXQAv7.png

Some people read closer than others.

https://pic8.co/sh/QVZOIr.png

Notice I have a lot more intelligence than you. I don't mean brain power. I mean computer power. My intelligence is reliable and I know that the Intelligence community is mostly geared towards spying and lying on each other. The dangerously stupid are just gullible enough to fall for lies not even meant for them.