WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Where is the actual source on this?

If this has anything to do with Judicial Watch, I cannot find the post or any relation to it.

As far as I can tell this is just a tweet by someone with a real shoddy Wordpress that only contains TWO ARTICLES. This is POAL, motherfucker. Get your trash out of here; I need facts.

[–] 1 pt

The fraud is rampant, everywhere, and being simultaneously used to bury Biden evidence. 100k is the tip of the iceberg.

Judicial Watch has been on this more than anyone else, trying to clean up voter roles in many states. They haven't been super successful, but if there is one person who actually seems to be doing something, it is Tom Fitton.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/investigative-bulletin/ballot-update-judicial-watch-cleans-up-dirty-voter-rolls/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=investigative_bulletin

[–] 1 pt

We are well passed the tip of the iceberg. That event was Tuesday when Fox called AZ for Biden with nothing counted.

[–] 0 pt

The lawyers have it, now. It's up to the lawyers.

[–] 1 pt
[–] 3 pts

I'm okay. I thought we were using reputable sources.

I can't find where Judicial Watch has said anything about this. The tweet you posted is from (((NBC))). No shit they are going to lie. These aren't real numbers.

[–] 3 pts

If they admitted 100K that means it's probably much more.

[–] 0 pt

He might just not be a faggot and therefore does not click faggoty twitter links.

But that's just conjecture on my part.

[–] 2 pts

That's what the archive link is for.