They're doing it again--Breitbart lying, that is--
No, the judge didn't say they "don't have to match"
The judge said that they can't throw them out without giving the voter an opportunity to contest it
you know, for the old ladies with arthritis whose signatures change aren't the same? or the college kids whose signature they weren't used to forming when they signed their driver's license, etc.
They still have to match to be counted. This is a great example why Breitbart is not considered a reliable source by researchers.
When you get all political it really gets going. Talk more about corruption in politics oh ya baby.
it's not really corrupt to not want fairness in elections and want want to have a "zero tolerance" policy about signatures
more like "unconstitutional"
good news for anti-fascists is that there are still good judges out there
Do you consider these reliable?
CNN newsroom: no
CNN editorial room: no but there are some good writers
NYT newsroom: yes (probably the best newsroom on earth)
NYT editorial room: no they are petty and classist
Fox News newsroom: yes
Fox News editorial division: lol, no
NBC News: yes
NBC editorial room: doesn't exist
CBS newsroom: yes, they're excellent
CBS editorial room: I'm not sure what this would be, this is almost what CNN is for
NPR newsroom: yes, they're excellent
NPR editorial room: yeah actually they're really great about presenting expert or listener opinions from multiple sides, and they're especially careful to do so on political stories
I can't explain it but the style of format you use in your posts really gets excited. Are you trained in memetic communications
Bwahahahahaha it’s almost as funny as the Navy Seal Copypasta 😂😂😂
Thanks for the good laugh.
So you don’t have a problem with a group of people that represents 2% of the U.S. population owning and controlling 99% of the fake news MSM.
Noted.
(post is archived)