WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

505

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Nothing to do with free speech.

Technically speaking, she violated 18 U.S.C. § 2071 which deals with the mutilation of official federal records & sets a criminal penalty of destroying documents of up to three years in prison.

Dems in congress voted to give themselves Prosecutorial Immunity.

No one should be above the law.

[–] 0 pt

I agree in that no one should be above the law. I would also point out that it was only a copy, not actually an official document. Serious question: is a copy considered an official document?

Purely out of curiosity, do we need to pursue anyone who has ever recycled/thrown away a speech from previous years? Garbagemen, janitors, etc.

[–] 2 pts

If Pelosi tore up a copy of the official document then I have no problem with it, other than her behavior. If she tore up an official federal record she should be charged with it and forced to explain her actions to a jury. If they acquit her, that's it then.

[–] 4 pts

other than her behavior.

Which shows how emotionally unstable she is and shouldn't be a speaker.

[–] 2 pts

Purely out of curiosity, do we need to pursue anyone who has ever recycled/thrown away a speech from previous years? Garbagemen, janitors, etc.

Nice strawman, but she's not a Janitor, and it was not her job/concern to destroy official documents (copies or not).

[–] 0 pt

But it's her free speech to do so. Also, it matters what is considered an official document- were those papers considered an official document?

If so, then yes- she may have broken the law (although counter-point, 1st amendment). Otherwise it wasn't and it wasn't breaking the law.

I don't like her one bit, but the laws should apply to all of us equally.