But destruction of symbols and objects has been shown to be free speech in at least one other specific area: burning the American flag.
As long as these symbols and objects are your properties, you can do whatever you want with it.
That means it wasn't a government record, just a piece of paper that Trump gave her.
If you can provide evidences that he actually gave her these documents (to troll her, and thus explains why she went full retard at the end of the speech), I'll gladly apologize.
I can find , and . That's the best I've got; both of those articles talk to law professors, one from Yale and one from the University of Minnesota.
Thanks for the links, but I wouldn't use Reuters and AP as fact checkers. Their integrity is more than questionable, as they are run by pro-democrats.
I can't blame you on that. It seems that sites which lean any other direction don't comment on or bring up that fact specifically.
Unfortunately I can't find any other data about the document's status. It would be interesting to know if the SOTU addresses get filed.
(post is archived)