WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

724

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

That's the stepmom! She has no biological connection to the officer charged. That's how insane it has gotten.

[–] 3 pts

Wow. That's a lawsuit.

[–] 3 pts

I seem to remember a lesson in sunday school about "sins of the father". Which is weird b/c this is the dudes mom and his shooting was clean and clear 100% self-defense

[–] 0 pt

It's never self-defence when a cop kills someone because all cops violate the NAP just by being cops, and are thus always the instigators of all their interactions. For the same reason, it is always self-defence whenever a non-cop kills a cop. If you plan ahead and sneak into a cop's home and slit his throat in his sleep, it is justified as self-defence.

And that's not even accounting for their race treachery.

[–] 0 pt

Not all enforcement of laws is a violation of the NAP. Specifically laws that ARE a violation of the NAP. Drug law enforcement is an obvious violation...