Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

Have you found this to be true?

It seems like liberals are almost always outspoken, while conservatives by-and-large keep their beliefs to themselves. Liberalism is "safer" to express in most social settings, and it also places a high value on evangelism.

I think this is kind of a whitepill. A lot of people become demoralized after seeing all the liberal messaging around them. It helps to recognize that liberals are just a lot more likely to speak, and that the silent majority often harbors conservative feelings they're too hesitant to share.

Have you found this to be true? It seems like liberals are almost always outspoken, while conservatives by-and-large keep their beliefs to themselves. Liberalism is "safer" to express in most social settings, and it also places a high value on evangelism. I think this is kind of a whitepill. A lot of people become demoralized after seeing all the liberal messaging around them. It helps to recognize that liberals are just a lot more likely to speak, and that the silent majority often harbors conservative feelings they're too hesitant to share.

(post is archived)

[–] • 10 pts

I don't think this is a hard fast rule but I do thinknit tends to be true and something I needed to be reminded of right about now.

[–] • 11 pts (edited )

I don't discuss politics in my professional or extended personal life b/c it's just not worth the hassle. I was raised w/ the notion since I was a child that you shouldn't discuss politics at work b/c it's unprofessional or w/ extended family b/c it never leads to anything good. These lessons are as true today as they ever were. Social media has reinforced and entrenched the 2 party system. One issue voters drawing a line in the sand for masturbatory likes that don't mean a damn thing. That's why I choose "anti-social" media. I don't have to agree w/ everyone... you're all a bunch of faggots though and yes we can still talk tomorrow...

[–] • 0 pt

That sort of "go along to get along" bullshit is how we got where we currently are.

Nobody talks about the real issues, instead we get nigger worship, because it's the path of least resistance.

If I hear some clown talking, in public, about global homo, or niggers are wonderful, I chime right in.

Not discussing politics, or religion, is a truly cucked philosophy.

[–] • 8 pts

I would tend to think this is true, I often times wonder if conservatives should speak out more.

[–] • 5 pts

We absolutely should. But in today's environment, we have to be smart about it. There needs to be more discussion on how to reach the average person and not be socially ostracized.

[–] • 6 pts

I think normalizing conservative ideas might be part of how we get there but what do I know I'm just some guy on the internet.

[–] • 1 pt

I agree, and not to single you out, but I think "just some guy on the Internet" perfectly explains the conservative mindset.

Basically conservatives see ourselves as regular people while liberals see themselves as "advocates for justice" or "civil rights experts". Conservatives are amateurs while liberals are professionals - in terms of mindset, engagement, training, etc.

We really need to get over this if conservatives are going to start winning. An easy place to start would be to use Poal as an organizing platform for things like boycotts. Imagine getting every major user on this site to boycott a list of companies, and send every company an e-mail saying why they're boycotting. And then go a step further, and reach out to other conservatives online and get them to boycott too. It could be the start of something great.

[–] • 7 pts

They are using the chilling effect of the threat of violence or financial ruin after being doxxed as the centerpiece of their strategy they want the majority to be subdued and in fearful silence so that they can institute minority rule.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilling_effect

[–] • 2 pts

That's a really important concept. Thanks for posting.

[–] [deleted] • 7 pts

I think it's absolutely true, ergo the phrase, 'the silent majority'.

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

The last guy I shared an office with seemed really uptight, but thorough and punctual about his work; German last name, too. He did soften a bit, but politics really didn't come up until a few weeks into the job. I'd up the estimate to a month, but by and large, a few days is usually plenty to tell.

[–] • 2 pts

Definitely true in the corporate world. Leftism is part of every corporation's agenda nowadays. My company's slack channel is flooded with leftist shit and the conservatives i know keep silent.

[–] • 2 pts

Whenever I tell people my politics, they are always astounded.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

This is easily explained when you consider what conservatives are compared to progressives. Progressives urge for progress, or change and so become mavins of driving this.

Conservatives don't yearn for change, so don't show a persistent agitation or obsessive desire to talk about anything or sell their politics.

[–] • 1 pt

You are totally right-on. This is exactly the issue we're facing today

We really need to get over this if conservatives are going to start winning. An easy place to start would be to use Poal as an organizing platform for things like boycotts. Imagine getting every major user on this site to boycott a list of companies, and send every company an e-mail saying why they're boycotting. And then go a step further, and reach out to other conservatives online and get them to boycott too. It could be the start of something great.

I write more about this , you should check it out and let me know what you think.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I think we're on the same track. I hadn't seen that post so checking it out now. Maybe an interesting subverse called Boycotts or some thing like that would be a great place to centralize this organization? On top of boycotting companies that are clearly seditious, I recommend .

[–] • 1 pt

Come to think of it I already have a subverse that may work well for this - . Let me know if you're interested and I'll make you a mod (as long as you agree with the rules)

[–] • 1 pt

I'm actually not sure about a subverse. No harm in creating one of course, but we would need to get people interested enough to subscribe to it. It would be better to post boycott suggestions in a popular existing sub, such as , and have the boycott sub as a backup. Boycotts only work if you have a lot of people doing them after all, so we'd want to post about them in places with the greatest visibility.

Something a bit more organized than a subverse would be better too. I use Riot chatrooms (Riot is an open-source alternative to Discord), but even just staying in contact through private messages would help. It's important to get people more connected and involved than simply upvoting posts once in a while. There's many tasks that people would need to do: research companies to see if they're cucked or not, identify the best alternatives to cucked companies, send e-mails to the marketing departments of companies on the fence, spread awareness campaigns about bad companies, and promote the boycotts on larger platforms. We'd need a competent, interconnected, and dedicated team to accomplish all of this.

Interesting ideas btw. I'd like to see them further developed

Let me know if you want to create a subverse or if you have any other ideas for next steps.

[–] • 1 pt

When you constantly get censored by socmed and socjus platforms and people you tend to keep your reasonable opinions and ideas to yourself until you know the people you are talking with. It's a huge problem that you are threatened with violence and job loss for stating your opinion.

[–] • 1 pt

100% I don't know why liberals automatically assume everyone believes the way they do but it's annoying. I enjoy making it especially awkward for them by saying something like "Well, you never know how many people might not share the same views that you do."

[–] • 0 pt

Liberals and conservatives are both progressives, blue pill, and thus psychotics of the same sort. The only difference is how militant they are in pursuing their goal.

Load more (1 reply)