SCOTUS 'already ruling' on this case is some kritarchy bullshit. It boils down to an appeal to authority, illogical argument.
From the 4th Amendment:
>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects... shall not be violated...
If the SCOTUS doesn't recognize that I have a right to be secure in my person, bring on Civil War 2.0. I'd rather die that way than by some (((Gates Foundation))) population control concoction.
SCOTUS 'already ruling' on this case is some kritarchy bullshit. It boils down to an appeal to authority, illogical argument.
From the 4th Amendment:
>>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects... shall not be violated...
If the SCOTUS doesn't recognize that I have a right to be secure in my person, bring on Civil War 2.0. I'd rather die that way than by some (((Gates Foundation))) population control concoction.
(post is archived)