To my knowledge, this hasn't been done so I don't think there's ever been a challenge between 10A and Interstate Commerce. If 10A wins, this could be a huge restriction/expansion on what the feds or states can do. I'd prefer states affected by the states forming pacts go after the pacts themselves; if the administration does it and wins, that gives a huge ace to the next lefty that comes into power. That's the thing that bothers me the most about all this bullshit regarding Wuhan virus.
Interesting to see if leftoids would use 'state's rights' all the sudden as a key platform issue. I also want to see how far "state compacts" go.
Current speculation, as a resident of Commiefornia, the three West coast states pact would allow free travel between the three but only if you are tracked and vaccinated. Basically, this is literally the mark of the beast as those that study the Bible talk about. You wouldn't be allowed to enter without doing one or both and if they did let you enter, you'd probably have to go under some kind of quarantine.
It would be like the Soviet Union where you need approval to go anywhere and do anything.
With all the secessionist movements on the west coast, I would not be surprised such a 'pact' is history in the making in terms of autonomy; but the world's 8th largest economy cannot slip away from the Federal Government.
Here in the 'northeast pact', I see Philly comments and news bites about hassles at the border's between states (PA drinkers going on booze runs).
Cuomo and Newsom also happen to have the regional economies and media support to resist the Feds.
(post is archived)