Ok. I thought you were trying to make an argument that would convince someone who disagrees with private property. to conclude my previous comment, the crux of the matter is that commies prefer a social safety net over free enterprise because their free enterprise has less value than the social safety net, to them. That's one path to being a commie. Basically the last man path. Another path is being a collectivist/imperialist of sorts (basically the instinct of advancing your race, nationality or w.e) and thinking that private property is inefficient with that goal. At the end of the day what drives people to be against property rights is that A- They have a desire other than property rights and B- they think property rights are inefficient compared to an alternative in achieveing that goal. For example you used to have peopel itnerested in national prosperity who thought central planning was more efficient than markets. But they kinda got rekt empircally on that one, still there is no shortage of people who criticize markets (since they are indeed imperfect due to not being run by omniscient agents lmao) In the first example, they just wanted to be evolutionarily viable in the shrot term and they (THINK they) are better of with muh safety net.