already ask about what you put from Jewpedia to see what they say to me
already ask about what you put from Jewpedia to see what they say to me
Your sentence is barely understandable, but well, since you seem to talk about wikipedia; if everything is tinted by jews, wikipedia is as good or bad as anything
And quite frankly that's not an argument on topics that aren't controversial. Controversial like politics or niche topics such as chiropractic
If wikipedia was more than 20% wrong nobody would use it, wikipedia is mostly mainstream references when it comes to history
What's a credible source then, if jews are everywhere? There's no credible source then
Then what? Even your sources are wrong then... It has to make sense
Your sentence is barely understandable, but well, since you seem to talk about wikipedia; if everything is tinted by jews, wikipedia is as good or bad as anything
And quite frankly that's not an argument on topics that aren't controversial. Controversial like politics or niche topics such as chiropractic
If wikipedia was more than 20% wrong nobody would use it, wikipedia is mostly mainstream references when it comes to history
What's a credible source then, if jews are everywhere? There's no credible source then
Then what? Even your sources are wrong then... It has to make sense
(post is archived)