WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Jewish wikipedia I don't know if he tells the truth there or not because, as the co-founder of "Wikipedia", Jimmy Wales, says, he admits it publicly by saying

     “People trust Wikipedia too much, they believe everything they read”

The truth is that you (Jews) say that the temples were razed by 2 different enemies on the same day in different years. One of two, or it is a coincidence or you are inventing these grievances and you are a liar and if you invent others grievances is capable of inventing others. I personally have very clear this issue. There are many squares with dates and events in the book. I have not had time to translate it into English because as I say the servers ask me to cut it into parts and it was delayed a lot and time did not reach me

http://www.mediafire.com/file/bowl5pfg6qhw4fy/LA_LEY_DE_MOISES_%2528DOS_M%25C3%2581S_DOS_SON_CUATRO%2529.pdf/file

[–] 0 pt

How comes they never fail? Did they ever fail? If yes how?

[–] 0 pt

already ask about what you put from Jewpedia to see what they say to me

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Your sentence is barely understandable, but well, since you seem to talk about wikipedia; if everything is tinted by jews, wikipedia is as good or bad as anything

And quite frankly that's not an argument on topics that aren't controversial. Controversial like politics or niche topics such as chiropractic

If wikipedia was more than 20% wrong nobody would use it, wikipedia is mostly mainstream references when it comes to history

What's a credible source then, if jews are everywhere? There's no credible source then

Then what? Even your sources are wrong then... It has to make sense