Fascists = nationalists (nation = people, tribal). Fascism is not necessarily collectivist. Communists = internationalist. Communism is anti-individualism <- this is why they're worse, as commies believe things like ownership and family should be banned. This is also fully collectivist/socialist. Have you by any chance seen Europa: the last battle, on bitchute? It is a really great documentary about ww2 history and the ideological battles between the two groups. I know how people describe the two as though they're really close to the same thing, which seems to be true but there are differences. Also, keep in mind socialism has multiple meanings: 1) could mean collectivist, 2) that you care about the social welfare of people, so don't allow things like heroin, etc. The differences manifest themselves very differently the deeper you go. Please consider that history books and places like Wikipedia are total BS on what it says about the two. Almost all of those places are UN funded - history is written by the victors. WW2 was fought between internationalists and nationalists. The Wiemar republic in Germany was communist. The blackshirts (antifa) and brownshirts (natsoc henchmen) competed but manifested similarly which were essentially both anarchists. I don't fear the anarchists, I fear the communism. Antifa are anarchists that want communism. I would fear brownshirts, but not necessarily fascism.