You're missing the point. The point is that they all share the values of repression and control. Antifa is not anarchist. They are working for globalists. And since the ones in Germany are working directly for the state, they can be considered fascists only in the terms of multinationalism. They can also be considered communists since they work for globalist jews. Either way it doesn't matter.
Communism itself isn't internationalist. It's globalist form is.
And yes, WW2 was fought between nationalism and globalism. That doesn't make communism the same as globalism, only a root cause by way of those who created it. Communism during the early 20th was not globalist. It was an imperialistic, state controlled system.
I don't fear the anarchists, I fear the communism.
They work for the same people.
I see the disconnect we're having. I do see they are working for the state. The government of Germany is pushing for communism. Merkel for example won the EU Kalergi prize, you know "many languages one voice." To Merkel, there is no nation of germany anymore, as she's running the Kalergi plan. She is literally a communist traitor. The multiculturalism is a phase in the Kalergi plan.
Communism itself isn't internationalist.
This is THE definition actually. Communism is "equality" meaning all classes, all races, all people to be equal. Communism is anti-nation, anti-individual. They've had communist nations, but their goal is internationalism, one world government.
That's not in the definition at all. Collectivization at the state level != collectivization at the world level
Hey there. I found this video on another site a few minutes ago which is related to what I was saying about communism = internationalism. So, I thought I'd post it as well in case you wanted to watch it, as it's only a few minutes.
Collectivization at the state level != collectivization at the world level
This statement is correct, but useless when talking about Communism vs Fascism. Collectivism isn't what fascism is about at all - it can be utilized but also can not be. Read Mein Kampf, or check out Europa: The Last Battle for what National Socialist Germany was about. Communism is collectivism to the extreme, and comminism = internationalism = no individuality.
That's not in the definition at all.
The dictionary will tell you BS definitions. I recommend you read Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto. This is part of the vilification of fascism, which is nationalistic (national = natal, to be born from, tribal) versus communism which is a person is a person is a person, comrade. Check out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proletarian_internationalism
The details are interesting. Karl Marx died stateless because he denounced his German citizenship and refused to take another. Marx and Engles were funded to write the Communist Manifesto by the Rothschild family. Karl Marx was a Jesuit (who are SJW commies, actually) and hated religion, including Judaism because religions are individualistic. The point of USSR was to spread communism as far as possible and this was what the big red threat was all about in the 50's and 60's.
Except for the Ordo ab Chao part, all of what I'm saying is in the Communism Manifesto. They make it sound glorious, but what they are really aiming for is something like the book Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. It's terrifying.
The anarchist part comes from the Marxist (and also Trotsky) perpetual revolution. This is what Antifa's role is. ORDO AB CHAO. Ordo is the normalized communism (pure equality, no individualism, no family) and Chao is Antifa (chaos, agitation, revolution, disorder). Note that ORDO AB CHAO is a freemason term, but freemasons are also communists. The brown shirts were also anarchists. Both antifa and brown shirts utilize agitation techniques, recently laid out in books like Rules for Radicals, by Saul Alinsky.
Getting stuck on collectivism and other ideas are what are in your history books and other wikipedia places. That shit is pozzed and the people publishing that garbage are trying to subvert you.
(post is archived)