Fascists = nationalists (nation = people, tribal). Fascism is not necessarily collectivist.
Communists = internationalist. Communism is anti-individualism <- this is why they're worse, as commies believe things like ownership and family should be banned. This is also fully collectivist/socialist.
Have you by any chance seen Europa: the last battle, on bitchute? It is a really great documentary about ww2 history and the ideological battles between the two groups. I know how people describe the two as though they're really close to the same thing, which seems to be true but there are differences. Also, keep in mind socialism has multiple meanings: 1) could mean collectivist, 2) that you care about the social welfare of people, so don't allow things like heroin, etc. The differences manifest themselves very differently the deeper you go.
Please consider that history books and places like Wikipedia are total BS on what it says about the two. Almost all of those places are UN funded - history is written by the victors.
WW2 was fought between internationalists and nationalists. The Wiemar republic in Germany was communist. The blackshirts (antifa) and brownshirts (natsoc henchmen) competed but manifested similarly which were essentially both anarchists.
I don't fear the anarchists, I fear the communism. Antifa are anarchists that want communism. I would fear brownshirts, but not necessarily fascism.
You're missing the point. The point is that they all share the values of repression and control. Antifa is not anarchist. They are working for globalists. And since the ones in Germany are working directly for the state, they can be considered fascists only in the terms of multinationalism. They can also be considered communists since they work for globalist jews. Either way it doesn't matter.
Communism itself isn't internationalist. It's globalist form is.
And yes, WW2 was fought between nationalism and globalism. That doesn't make communism the same as globalism, only a root cause by way of those who created it. Communism during the early 20th was not globalist. It was an imperialistic, state controlled system.
I don't fear the anarchists, I fear the communism.
They work for the same people.
I see the disconnect we're having. I do see they are working for the state. The government of Germany is pushing for communism. Merkel for example won the EU Kalergi prize, you know "many languages one voice." To Merkel, there is no nation of germany anymore, as she's running the Kalergi plan. She is literally a communist traitor. The multiculturalism is a phase in the Kalergi plan.
Communism itself isn't internationalist.
This is THE definition actually. Communism is "equality" meaning all classes, all races, all people to be equal. Communism is anti-nation, anti-individual. They've had communist nations, but their goal is internationalism, one world government.
That's not in the definition at all. Collectivization at the state level != collectivization at the world level
(post is archived)