Of course, I never felt as if it were an attack on me, I have thicker skin than that, fortunately. Thank you for your well thought out reply. And I would agree, consider the source, as I always do. I generally do not, however, discredit something merely for the source, although that is one filter which is wise to apply. I may be naive when it comes to communicating online as I am an older Poaler and do not often engage, but it does seem as if this site, while in its infancy and growing (thank you and ), has a user base that is thoughtful and intelligent and makes up their own minds regarding all kinds of matters, including sourcing a subject matter. I may have made the assumption that most here are familiar with RT, and hence your reply confused me. But we all know what happens when we assume, lol.
Again, thanks for the clarification, and I'll have to be sure to visit s/PaddysPub!
I am loving watching this discussion unfold, and to state the obvious because I actually understood that reference, when you assume you make an ass - our of - u - and - me in other words assume. I do get it every once in a while.
Thank you for your reply. I am in the same vein as you:
I am an older Poaler and do not often engage
It seems a majority of the time people online don't want to discuss, just argue. I have little appetite for that.
If you enjoy Paddys and the older genre of music I post there, you might also enjoy https://musicfor.us/ as it's a site I write for that details some of the early days of rock and its evolution. We post one song a day at 3:30 pm ct. The "About This Project" tab has an explanation of why we put the site together. Please feel free to discuss and add any content you wish.
(post is archived)