WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

327

jury in D.C. convicted him, an area which is

If Roger Stone's conviction isn't turned over in the first 90 days I'm going to assume Trump is controlled opposition and his job is to take down anyone who might present a threat or support a real candidate that opposes the deep state. Thats the only way to look at him allowing this to happen and go uncontested. And him 'trying' to protect roger stone and then failing because of "resistance from the swamp" isn't going to cut it either. That card was already played with immigration.

Roger Stone's conviction is going to be a litmus test for whether Trump is real, or a controlled opposition jew or catholic plant.

jury in D.C. convicted him, an area which is [91% democrat](https://www.infowars.com/roger-stone-juror-outs-himself-as-hardcore-leftist-after-trial-and-before-sentencing-proves-poisoned-jury-pool-theory/) If Roger Stone's conviction isn't turned over in the first 90 days I'm going to assume Trump is controlled opposition and his job is to take down anyone who might present a threat or support a real candidate that opposes the deep state. Thats the only way to look at him allowing this to happen and go uncontested. And him 'trying' to protect roger stone and then failing because of "resistance from the swamp" isn't going to cut it either. That card was already played with immigration. Roger Stone's conviction is going to be a litmus test for whether Trump is real, or a controlled opposition jew or catholic plant.

(post is archived)

Well as I understand it, roger stone fucked up, technically

He lied under oath, saying he did have contact with wikileaks, while this wasn't true

And of course the jury was 100% against him, and the judge too etc, but still

There were a couple of "technical wrongs" (who gives a shit in the end if he lied, the whole russia gate BS context in which he lied is fake as fuck to begin with)

Now maybe I'm wong and didn't fully get what was going on

But as I see it, he got raided by the opposition, and had a flank open to attack basically, and got screwed

[–] 1 pt

roger stone fucked up, technically

No, for starters, he shouldn't have been in the position to 'fuck up' to start with, because the entire raid was based on falsehoods.

He lied under oath, saying he did have contact with wikileaks, while this wasn't true

He lied under duress, after hours of questioning from what I heard. And who gives a shit. ooooo he lied that he TALKED to wikileaks, when that didn't even happen? Thats like someone claiming they own an unregistered BB gun, technically a lie, but at the end of the day completely irrelevant because theres no underlying crime.

he got raided by the opposition, and had a flank open to attack basically

This, it's a political hit job and as far as I'm concerned, it's a litmus test of Trump's loyalty.