Well as I understand it, roger stone fucked up, technically
He lied under oath, saying he did have contact with wikileaks, while this wasn't true
And of course the jury was 100% against him, and the judge too etc, but still
There were a couple of "technical wrongs" (who gives a shit in the end if he lied, the whole russia gate BS context in which he lied is fake as fuck to begin with)
Now maybe I'm wong and didn't fully get what was going on
But as I see it, he got raided by the opposition, and had a flank open to attack basically, and got screwed
roger stone fucked up, technically
No, for starters, he shouldn't have been in the position to 'fuck up' to start with, because the entire raid was based on falsehoods.
He lied under oath, saying he did have contact with wikileaks, while this wasn't true
He lied under duress, after hours of questioning from what I heard. And who gives a shit. ooooo he lied that he TALKED to wikileaks, when that didn't even happen? Thats like someone claiming they own an unregistered BB gun, technically a lie, but at the end of the day completely irrelevant because theres no underlying crime.
he got raided by the opposition, and had a flank open to attack basically
This, it's a political hit job and as far as I'm concerned, it's a litmus test of Trump's loyalty.
(post is archived)