Fuentes and the groypers are optics cucks to the point of disavowing wignats and calling them retarded. Anyone telling you to vote one way or another is an establishment tool, willing or not. Fuentes is a Mexican catholic amnat.
They are very clear that they're not wignats, so that disavowal shouldn't be surprising.
Anyone telling you to vote one way or another is an establishment tool
"Telling people how to vote" is obviously not the MO in play. It's about outing fake conservative grifters by asking questions their donors don't want them to answer. This whole response seems a little pat, like it came out of a handbook or something.
They weren't clear until recently. It was about optics at first but now he's capitulating for his swelling fan base. These larpy faggots will not fight. They don't care about demographics at all. If they did they would embrace the wignats instead of isolating them further. Nick is another up and coming Shapiro.
He banned someone for asking what would happen if Trump disavowed them all as antisemitic, which is a more than reasonable question since Trump converted to Judaism in 2009, and reaffirmed that faith in 2017.
Idk this whole "not extreme enough" argument starts to surface as soon as any grassroots conservative movement gets some teeth. They want to shut the door on immigration -- both legal and illegal -- precisely because the demographic change is harmful for our country. No matter how extreme you claim to be that should be a step in the right direction.
I'm sure you are primarily on another site and maybe have just been lurking here and making a few Q posts now and then for the past 4 months, but when inactive accounts start to come out of the woodwork saying shit like "yeah they're against demographic change, war for Israel, and globohomo, but they're not full on wignat neo-Nazi 1488 so that means they're fags" -- sorry, but I just have to take that with a grain of salt
Question for you: Are you willing to call yourself a wignat? Or are you just criticizing them for disavowing white nationalism?
Maybe Fuentes can be a stepping stone to popular support for Patrick Casey?
His role is to heard the cattle back to their proper place as Trump voters.
Instead, Nick needs to emphasize that the problems he's highlighting need to be addressed. As it stands, noone cares because everyone knows his followers will vote Trump regardless.
A message needs to be sent. America first is what Trump ran on. Not leftist fucking talking points.
(post is archived)