WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

243

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

They are scientists that have authority over such topics. Us plebs have no need to know their name even though they've made outlandish claims that should require further investigation. It is very much like the whistleblower's name, if we know the name of him (Eric Ciarmello or whatever the spelling is), the whole impeachment bullshit starts falling apart as responsible people will look at his past.

I think this is the new 97% of scientistsᵀᴹ number they are going to start using in a year or two after it has been forgotten about.

[–] 0 pt
[–] 1 pt

All you need to know:

This isn't a scientific analysis like the IPCC reports provide.

[–] 0 pt

Remember...all reports are not facts. They come to conclusions, not facts.

Climate "science" is not a true science as all they do is use probability algorithms to guess what is likely to happen, if the data they use is accurate and complete. It's neither.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

neither is "virus science" as its no more than cell-spot-reading, akin to tea leaf reading, palm reading and face reading.... are those exact sciences?!..... NO.... then why would cell-spot-reading using disney cgi graphics to connect the dots to create a "pattern" for illustrative and propaganda purposes have any more validity?!.... it doesnt, as face palm and tea leaf reading has alot more historical data!!... should we be "funding" gypsy fortune tellers to the tune of trillions.... or are we already by funding "virus" cell-spot/anomaly-reading?!...a "virus scientists" would be more appropriate wearing a gypsy turban, it's pure fraud!!!

meanwhile people are paying 100s of thousands of dollars to "learn" this bogus fraud in colleges, without ever overstanding that a "virus" is no more than cell spot reading... a country of idiots, how cute!!!