I don't really know what to think about it. It seems like he makes a "good point" but then he basically is saying vailed commie/socialist/marxist shit.
"The people that want you and all of your friends and family dead are not the enemy, its the companies that are the enemy". I think I get what he may be intending but that's kind of how it comes across.
I can't tell if he's using "corporations" as a proxy for not being able to say jews, but the message is weak. He's doing more to redirect us than to get us to think about what we are faced with. It's like he's calling for violence to be directed towards corporations as a means to motivate the conservatives to violence while ensuring that action is seen as abhorrent and vile.
I don't know how the civil war will go, but I don't think we should be confining our actions towards anything but the jews first and everything second. Not corporations that jews hide behind but the demons themselves. No more time for tilting at windmills. It's 110 or death for us at this point. Choose for yourselves how you act if they get their (((civil war))).
I can't tell if he's using "corporations" as a proxy for not being able to say jews...
I kept waiting and hoping he'd name the jew and was let down when he didn't. [Spoiler alert.]
...but then he basically is saying vailed commie/socialist/marxist shit.
Yeah. I think he means well but he doesn't know how to express it correctly.
(post is archived)