Either way, he has to know how big of an issue this is to much of his base. It's tone deaf to blow off the question. It isn't like this came out of nowhere, the DOJ just dropped this pile of crap yesterday.
Either way, he has to know how big of an issue this is to much of his base. It's tone deaf to blow off the question. It isn't like this came out of nowhere, the DOJ just dropped this pile of crap yesterday.
Either way, he has to know how big of an issue this is to much of his base. It's tone deaf to blow off the question. It isn't like this came out of nowhere, the DOJ just dropped this pile of crap yesterday.
He thought his 2D checkers document dump fiasco was going to fool the MAGAtards enough to side-step having to address it for real. It didn't work and people are asking more questions now. That's why they had the DOJ say "there's nothing to see here so move along". He's trying to shift the window. Beware of FF distractions incoming.
>Either way, he has to know how big of an issue this is to much of his base. It's tone deaf to blow off the question. It isn't like this came out of nowhere, the DOJ just dropped this pile of crap yesterday.
He thought his 2D checkers document dump fiasco was going to fool the MAGAtards enough to side-step having to address it for real. It didn't work and people are asking more questions now. That's why they had the DOJ say "there's nothing to see here so move along". He's trying to shift the window. Beware of FF distractions incoming.
(post is archived)