Yeah but MLK remains the gold standard of boomer-centric-egalitarian-race-denialism from the late 70s onward, and yeah you judge people on what they do because that's the moral thing to do, but then the story just stops there and doesn't take trends and statistics into consideration regarding what ethnic groups actually do... The individual the group... The trends, the odds... Situational awareness and all that, I'm not going to preach to the choirs here you get the idea
Just because a jew wrote it doesn't render it automatically false
Just because a jew wrote it doesn't render it automatically false
When did I say it was automatically false? My point is the intention behind it was subversion.
MLK is no different than Leonardo DiCaprio or Will Smith acting in a movie. His speeches were LITERALLY a script written for him by a jew, just like pedowood.
My point is the intent behind MLK's speeches was the gradual subversion of WASP and White Catholic culture in the US, not the words written in the scripts.
The subversive works with "things" that are already there and leads them off balance using their own momentum, the subversive doesn't create anything
Was MLK even aware he was a subversion tool for the worse?
No. He was a well paid actor!
Actors read scripts written by other people. That's what MLK did.
Look into Stanley David Levison. He ran the entire operation, financed MLK (i.e. paid him), and wrote all his speeches.
(post is archived)