WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

Our guy (questionmark)

#Our guy (questionmark)

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Putin is not our guy but he is correct. I believe that speech also mentioned Weimer Germany and how marxist ruined it. Someone that almost is never mentioned is Hungary in 1956. Hungary was another jewish ran Weimer that the people overthrew and the Soviets had to go in and fix it by installing another government of non-jews. Of course this is never mentioned in American history books. That is why the people in Hungary hate any form of leftists or degeneracy. They had something like 25 years of it. Hungary was essentially a degenerate's heaven.

[–] 1 pt

He's making points in a way that should resonate with normies.

Every MLK speech was written by a zionist jewish lawyer who lived in NYC. He wrote all of MLK's speeches, raised money for him, and even did his taxes.

Putin shouldn't quote MLK. MLK's views were the "camel's nose under the tent" of jewish subversion. During the 60's to 10's, the progressive movement was kept extremely positive, in order to make conservatives look backwards by comparison. That subversion is now rearing its ugly head. MLK's speeches were never about their contents. They were simply a planned step or stage in a much deeper, evil subversion into talmudic values being imposed upon European nations.

[–] 0 pt

Yeah but MLK remains the gold standard of boomer-centric-egalitarian-race-denialism from the late 70s onward, and yeah you judge people on what they do because that's the moral thing to do, but then the story just stops there and doesn't take trends and statistics into consideration regarding what ethnic groups actually do... The individual the group... The trends, the odds... Situational awareness and all that, I'm not going to preach to the choirs here you get the idea

Just because a jew wrote it doesn't render it automatically false

[–] 0 pt

Just because a jew wrote it doesn't render it automatically false

When did I say it was automatically false? My point is the intention behind it was subversion.

MLK is no different than Leonardo DiCaprio or Will Smith acting in a movie. His speeches were LITERALLY a script written for him by a jew, just like pedowood.

My point is the intent behind MLK's speeches was the gradual subversion of WASP and White Catholic culture in the US, not the words written in the scripts.

[–] 0 pt

The subversive works with "things" that are already there and leads them off balance using their own momentum, the subversive doesn't create anything

Was MLK even aware he was a subversion tool for the worse?

[–] 0 pt

Putin is not /ourguy/. He made it illegal to deny the holohoax in Russia.

[–] 0 pt

Source?