[Samuel Adams approves of this party.](https://pic8.co/sh/V4xH77.jpeg)
The thing about boycotting Pissweiser is that even if it doesn't achieve the desired economic effect, it will still improve your life.
The thing about boycotting Pissweiser is that even if it doesn't achieve the desired economic effect, it will still improve your life.
Yes! And that will help make normies think about all of the other multinational corporate products in their life, whether they really need them or not.
Yes! And that will help make normies think about all of the other multinational corporate products in their life, whether they really need them or not.
Were they not warned thousands of years ago. Not to harm the olive oil or the wine (alcohol). Maybe they will soon not want to use product to push agenda and have this happen. That would be great. All globalist ESG following companies should be boycotted as the following the ESG already neuters the business IMO...
Were they not warned thousands of years ago. Not to harm the olive oil or the wine (alcohol). Maybe they will soon not want to use product to push agenda and have this happen. That would be great. All globalist ESG following companies should be boycotted as the following the ESG already neuters the business IMO...
The equivalent of the boston tea party would be sinking a cargo ship from china.
The equivalent of the boston tea party would be sinking a cargo ship from china.
Supply chain issjews?
Supply chain issjews?
I don't recall the redmen sinking the merchant ship, just destroying the tea it contained by throwing it in the ocean.
Conservative consumers leaving Budweiser on the pallet to rot (by not buying it) serves a similar purpose.
I'm not claiming this is a perfect meme but I thought it was pretty good and it made me chuckle. I've seen far worse memes posted here.
I don't recall the redmen sinking the merchant ship, just destroying the tea it contained by throwing it in the ocean.
Conservative consumers leaving Budweiser on the pallet to rot (by not buying it) serves a similar purpose.
I'm not claiming this is a perfect meme but I thought it was pretty good and it made me chuckle. I've seen far worse memes posted here.
Whichever is easier
Whichever is easier
In 1776 they backed that shit up and took care of business by taking up arms against an unjust government. You know, kinda like the Declaration of Independence says we have the RIGHT to do.
In 1776 they backed that shit up and took care of business by taking up arms against an unjust government. You know, kinda like the Declaration of Independence says we have the RIGHT to do.
You mean in our representative republic renamed by godless jews to a democracy?
You mean in our representative republic renamed by godless jews to a democracy?
Wrong they simply declared independence from an already foreign government. They didn't go to Britain and take it over in revolution like you all act.
Nobody on the right wants to face what they have to do if they want to repeat 1776. Secede, start a new US and simply ignore the previous.
Wrong they simply declared independence from an already foreign government. They didn't go to Britain and take it over in revolution like you all act.
Nobody on the right wants to face what they have to do if they want to repeat 1776. Secede, start a new US and simply ignore the previous.
Awful comparison. They're not remotely similar. One was a 3% tax on tea that caused a group of White men to fight off the jewish banker's controlling the British Empire. One is a private company using a troon in advertising.
Awful comparison. They're not remotely similar.
One was a 3% tax on tea that caused a group of White men to fight off the jewish banker's controlling the British Empire. One is a private company using a troon in advertising.
One is a private company using a troon in advertising.
jewish banker controlled multinational corporate A-B Troon tax for the goyem. They want to rub degeneracy in your face.
>One is a private company using a troon in advertising.
jewish banker controlled multinational corporate A-B Troon tax for the goyem. They want to rub degeneracy in your face.
Sure, jews control AB, but the similarities end there. Is a revolution to remove the ZOG in control of the US going to happen? No. Is it a tax? No. Is it in a completely different continent? No. Was 1776 about "degeneracy"? No.
I fully understand what's being implied. But it's an extremely poor comparison and belittles history. A 3% tax on tea caused a revolution to overthrow the biggest Empire on Earth. People should appreciate that, not belittle it for a shit meme.
Sure, jews control AB, but the similarities end there. Is a revolution to remove the ZOG in control of the US going to happen? No. Is it a tax? No. Is it in a completely different continent? No. Was 1776 about "degeneracy"? No.
I fully understand what's being implied. But it's an extremely poor comparison and belittles history. A 3% tax on tea caused a revolution to overthrow the biggest Empire on Earth. People should appreciate that, not belittle it for a shit meme.
Is it a tax? No.
It taxes our sanity, civility, principles, religion, laws of nature ... and whereas advertising $$$ is generated from sales, in effect they are making us pay for them to promote this degeneracy.
In 1773 we had taxation without representation, in 2023 we have this A-B taxation but we can let their beer rot on the pallets and take our business elsewhere.
But it's an extremely poor comparison and belittles history.
It's just a meme. C'mon, man!
>Is it a tax? No.
It taxes our sanity, civility, principles, religion, laws of nature ... and whereas advertising $$$ is generated from sales, in effect they are making us pay for them to promote this degeneracy.
In 1773 we had taxation without representation, in 2023 we have this A-B taxation but we can let their beer rot on the pallets and take our business elsewhere.
>But it's an extremely poor comparison and belittles history.
It's just a meme. C'mon, man!
In the end, Anheuser-Busch wins once all these boycotting Conservative fudds quietly move on and go back to drinking Bud Light. Which they will, once the YouTube Wacky Video makes (grifters) figure out they aren't generating enough as revenue from clicks and need to move on to the next hot topic.
Anheuser-Busch has billions of dollars to wait out the conservative boycott.
In the end, Anheuser-Busch wins once all these boycotting Conservative fudds quietly move on and go back to drinking Bud Light. Which they will, once the YouTube Wacky Video makes (grifters) figure out they aren't generating enough as revenue from clicks and need to move on to the next hot topic.
Anheuser-Busch has billions of dollars to wait out the conservative boycott.
I wouldn't confuse "boycott" with "I'm done with you!". A significant % of those offended and pissed off customers aren't ever coming back. A-B destroyed the brand and all of it's American symbolism, to be replaced with Dylan Mulvaney forever. Better beer options are abundant. They may get a dead cat bounce but how low will it go?
I wouldn't confuse "boycott" with "I'm done with you!". A significant % of those offended and pissed off customers aren't ever coming back. A-B destroyed the brand and all of it's American symbolism, to be replaced with Dylan Mulvaney forever. Better beer options are abundant. They
may get a dead cat bounce but how low will it go?
But you're not getting my point.
If 50,000 conservatives never buy another can of Bud Light forever, it doesn't matter to Anheuser Busch. They have billions of dollars. They've already won. Same with the boycott of Disney. Or the boycott of "Woke-a-Cola". Remember that one? Coke is doing fine.
But you're not getting my point.
If 50,000 conservatives never buy another can of Bud Light forever, it doesn't matter to Anheuser Busch. They have billions of dollars. They've already won. Same with the boycott of Disney. Or the boycott of "Woke-a-Cola". Remember that one? Coke is doing fine.
Yes, they currently have a lot of money and can withstand a dramatic drop in demand for a long time, but the brand sales will never come back to its previous level of dominance in this generation. If they continue virtue signalling with their other companies, same results. Revenues fall, that big bankroll eventually gets much smaller, stockholders get pissed off at the board, bad things happen for them.
Edit- I think 50K customers is a serious underestimation of the number of irate consumers turned off by this A-B marketing faux pas. They won't buy the product, they will divest from A-B, they are disgusted and won't be back. They will relentlessly ridicule their friends who continue to drink A-B until they too stop.
Yes, they currently have a lot of money and can withstand a dramatic drop in demand for a long time, but the brand sales will never come back to its previous level of dominance in this generation. If they continue virtue signalling with their other companies, same results. Revenues fall, that big bankroll eventually gets much smaller, stockholders get pissed off at the board, bad things happen for them.
Edit- I think 50K customers is a serious underestimation of the number of irate consumers turned off by this A-B marketing faux pas. They won't buy the product, they will divest from A-B, they are disgusted and won't be back. They will relentlessly ridicule their friends who continue to drink A-B until they too stop.
(post is archived)