Need sauce on this, if real that is awesome
Yeah, press x to doubt on this one. An independent gas station sure, but Costco gas? It'd make the news after some Karen reeee'd about the 'nazi propaganda'
It's blatantly fake sadly https://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=b241fa4e2f0072d6b79479fdcc092de0e731dee2.699470&show=ela
I don't understand, what is ELA? and the angle of the 2nd pic is different
What about this one from my friend in the bay area? https://pic8.co/sh/ipnIAY.jpeg
Looks better but it still says yes right in the middle
I don't think that's conclusive. High contrast regions like the "This sale" and "Gallons" produce similar error levels as the supoosedly fake text. Also, it's a PNG, not a JPG but I don't know how Fotoforensics treats these, might use similar compression algos?
From their tutorial:
What To Look For ELA highlights differences in the JPEG compression rate. Regions with uniform coloring, like a solid blue sky or a white wall, will likely have a lower ELA result (darker color) than high-contrast edges. The things to look for:
Edges: Similar edges should have similar brightness in the ELA result. All high-contrast edges should look similar to each other, and all low-contrast edges should look similar. With an original photo, low-contrast edges should be almost as bright as high-contrast edges.
Textures: Similar textures should have similar coloring under ELA. Areas with more surface detail, such as a close-up of a basketball, will likely have a higher ELA result than a smooth surface.
Surfaces: Regardless of the actual color of the surface, all flat surfaces should have about the same coloring under ELA.
Draw an imaginary line under the letters, they are not uniform
It also says "yes" right in the middle of the picture...
The letters are not in a uniform line, it's 'shopped
(post is archived)