Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

692

(post is archived)

[–] • 8 pts

From this interview (dailycaller.com) with his mom.

She revealed the last time she spoke with Ramos was on Monday, which was Ramos’ birthday, and the day before the shooting took place.

So does his mom not know his birthday, or is there a little more to the story. You can buy ammo without an id. I'm thinking he ordered the gun on the 17th (there is a reciept he posted online), and then actually picked it up on the Monday he turned 18. Also keep in mind there is no way he had a credit card since he just turned 18 less than a week ago (or a day ago depending on who you believe). So he rolled into a gun shop to pick up two AR with a $4k stack of bills.

Keep in mind, no FFL wants to be the guy who sold a gun to a murderer. Most of them are small business owners with families. There is little money made off of selling guns and processing FFL transfers. FFLs can reject the transfer especially if some whacked out kid who just turned 18 showed up with a wad of cash. That close to the border, they can just say they felt it was a straw purchase and be done with it.

[–] • 5 pts

Good point about buying ammo without an ID. I've never been carded for ammo even for online sales where an adult signing for it is nominally required (but never actually done).

[–] • 0 pt

You don't need to be 18 to have a credit card. Or at least I didn't. Maybe I lied on application or something.

[–] • 2 pts

Here's (experian.com) a source for you.

It's possible things have changed if you're decently older than me. I remember when I was in elementary school I could have a bank account in my name and access it as necessary. By the time I was in middle school the laws or rules had changed and my parents needed to be on the account. This was a huge problem for me at the time because I had a few hundred dollars in the bank from mowing lawns and I could no longer access it. Also, since my parents weren't on the account (since it wasn't previously required), they couldn't access the money either. It actually took like two trips over the course of a week to resolve. (((Bankers))) gonna bank I guess.

[–] • 0 pt

could have been a debit card.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Plus when you get that first Cc, the limit is way less than $3000, closer to 300!

[–] • 1 pt

Those are the same questions that I have been waiting for anyone in the media (including Tucker Carlson) to ask.

Starting with, where did he get the money for all of that hardware?

[–] • 5 pts

There's a missing fact I'm surprised isn't mentioned. The ATF must be notified on multiple semi automatic rifle sales in states that border Mexico.

[–] • 4 pts

He was likely aided. Heck they probably chose his target

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

I bet the person aiding him was the one that left the door open.

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

All this post does is provide ammo to the oppositions argument that "see, see how easy it is to obtain and learn how to use these guns so proficiently enough to kill at scale!"

No ones suddenly going to see this argument and say "oh man it really must be the police unions and federal agencies promoting violence, arming people for violence ,and grooming people for violence!"

The argument you SHOULD make is "shame on you for disarming teachers and students."

It sounds insane to the mod-left but

  1. will be unintentionally amplified by the triggered extreme 'left' (regime supporters and rinocrat conservatives).

  2. gives ammo to governors that are forced, becaue of electoral politics, to pick a side of the issue

  3. means that, where it gets passed, it becomes trivial to identity the leftfash vs sane teachers. The leftfash won't carry guns, the moderates and true conservatives will.

  4. This will help conservative teachers identify each other and form their own coalitions.

  5. It will make cleaning house a LOT easier whenever precinct takeoevers occur during local elections, supposing thats still possible.

Force commie teachers to carry guns. They'll either quit, look like hypocrites, be demoralized by how many teachers will (which we can amplify online by calling them "secret conservatives all along! Nah nah genderbenders, conservatives are everywhere"), and we can demoralize them further by rubbing in the fact that they're funding the very industry they want shut down.

Once even a fraction of teachers carry guns, say 3-10%, the cultural change becomes inevitible, as conservatives begin to see it as a much more welcoming profession.

This is how you bust a union.

[–] • 2 pts

This is absolutely correct. We spend a lot of time complaining about our leaders doing jack shit strategically in any dimension. However, the real problem is our people have NO FUCKING CLUE how to argue and get on offensive side of an argument. Now, to be fair, our side tries to include all perspectives and guarantee freedom for all as part of our nature, sure. However, the other side ONLY GOES ON THE OFFENSIVE and this is why such a teeeny tiny minority has been able to control the narrative. And this is the mistake our side keeps on making. We keep on trying to treat the world like they are our friends, which is 100% of the time a strategic loss.

We need to build something like blood sports for normies so that we can teach our people how to fight, argue and always be on the offensive against the enemy and ONLY reserve our true nature for our own.

Exceptional point.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

However, the other side ONLY GOES ON THE OFFENSIVE and this is why such a teeeny tiny minority has been able to control the narrative

actually I see this as only a small portion of the problem.

The bigger problem is the force amplifier of the media.

That needs to be cut right out or dampened enormously.

Our side learning how to argue effectively might affect things in the mid and long term, but neutralizing the ability of the media to manipulate the public, would basically cripple the regime's propagandists.

[–] • 0 pt

Once again, you hit it out of the park. So I am not the only one that understand the mechanics of the machine.

So you can see the moving parts as well I guess?

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

About the only thing I disagree with here is zeroing the red dot sight. At short range it doesn't have to be zeroed very well. He could've had no idea about zeroing it, threw it on and used it and if he wasn't going for 50+yard shots it wouldn't have made much difference.

Edit: Oh, and looks like the manufacturer includes that vertical grip, and it's likely shipped already mounted.

[–] • 1 pt

Remember the Nasim Youtube shooting where she didn’t kill a single person?

[–] • 1 pt

At least the Columbine shooters were thoughtful enough to have videos of them shooting watermelons in a forest.

[–] • 0 pt

He wasn't a tranny, that was a hoax, probably by glowies.

The reports I saw said he bought these guns in march.

The reports I've seen said he worked at a burger king, and before that we were told he was a NEET drop-out

An odd amount of ammo is a reasonable thing if you buy from craigslist or facebook marketplace.

Zeroing a red dot in close quarters wont do too much, zero that bitch on a carboard box in the woods would probably be enough and honestly a shitty airsoft red dot slapped on without zeroing it would have probably been good enough for doing a shooting in a small school building.

The school resource officer story has changed repeatedly.

Why did he need two rifles? What happened to the reports of a handgun? On the day of, the negress neighbor to the school filmed his entry on a cellphone, 1)why had she started filming prior to his entrance, 2)why were his hands and face over exposed as pure white even in the shadow of the building? 3)Was he wearing a mask and gloves with his hood up in the texas heat? 4)Was he still wearing that mask during the shootings, when and where did he get the body armor? Was he known to local police or feds? Why have reports about a school resource officer and police engagement of the shooter changed so much?