Keep trying you weak ass .gov bait while you fail to reply to direct statements like my comment about how your original statement is comically flawed. e.g. 1/6 protestors did none of the things you mention and were labeled terrorists and thrown in jail anyway.
But I tell you what, since I'm into charity, I'll play your game even though you can't hold up your end of the conversation. i.e. by replying to direct statements.
Lets try a real world application of my theory instead of your infantile straw man argument:
Had the truckers in Canada stood their ground when the police attacked them would they be instigating violence or practicing self defense?
Gnignignigni
That's still not a valid answer as to why ANYONE would consider you as a glownigger or an extremist if you're only advocating for legal activities...
See? That's the problem with your entire line of retarded reasoning here, it doesn't add up
Now maybe you're just plain dumb and that's why you still don't get it, you tell me
That moment you cry to AOU rather than answer a simple question. (Imagine being that much of a simp)
Let's try again:
Had the truckers in Canada stood their ground when the police attacked them would they be instigating violence or practicing self defense?
Had the truckers in Canada stood their ground when the police attacked them would they be instigating violence or practicing self defense?
Resisting arrest by shooting at cops isn't called "self defense" or "stand your ground" IRL. It's called resisting arrest and shooting at cops, and it's illegal
The real question here is
why would ANYONE consider you as a glownigger or an extremist if you're only advocating for legal activities?
Care to answer this time, you projecting faggotard?
(post is archived)