WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Reality is also that, actual glowniggers will try every trick in their book to turn you into a terrorist, so they can send you in prison, and if you start shooting people for religious or political reasons, principles, you become the very definition of a terrorist

I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just stating inconvenient facts here, but facts nonetheless

That's the world we're in, now

In an other era and/or an other part of the world, such approach as the one you're describing with the expression "line in the sand on principle", are or were part of the accepted norm/standards

[–] 0 pt

Reality is also that, actual glowniggers will try every trick in their book to turn you into a terrorist, so they can send you in prison.....

I hear this alot (emphasis added) and no one ever addresses my point that they will label you a terrorist anyway (anyone who wants an open election and the right to question results) then send you to prison regardless of if you committed a crime. (1/6 protestors)

[–] 0 pt

What are trying to get at here, what are you trying to advocate for?

You are advocating for whites to start shooting libtards for morale or political reasons?

I mean, go ahead cross the line

[–] 0 pt

I'm getting at this:

Someone makes a statement about "standing on principle" and some other cunt-fuck always tries to equate that with "shooting libtards" and calls to violence.

When you figure out who's the cunt-fuck in this scenario you'll have identified the cause of the problem with why the world is fucked.