WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

What are trying to get at here, what are you trying to advocate for?

You are advocating for whites to start shooting libtards for morale or political reasons?

I mean, go ahead cross the line

[–] 0 pt

I'm getting at this:

Someone makes a statement about "standing on principle" and some other cunt-fuck always tries to equate that with "shooting libtards" and calls to violence.

When you figure out who's the cunt-fuck in this scenario you'll have identified the cause of the problem with why the world is fucked.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Someone makes a statement about "standing on principle" and some other cunt-fuck always tries to equate that with "shooting libtards" and calls to violence.

Yeah of course, except you didn't make a statement about "standing on principle", you made a statement about "draw a line in the sand on principle", here https://poal.co/s/PoliticalMemes/525744/13ab3e22-d9a9-4820-b358-4090846a2600#cmnts

So, "standing on principle" as in what then? As in parading in the streets with signs?

Now about the so called "line in the sand", please be more explicit; when you say "draw a line in the sand on principle", what's on your mind exactly? Are you going to bring your shovel and a bucket and start building sand castles or some shit? Parading with signs maybe? Hm?

The problem no one is allowed to ever draw a line in the sand on principle. The left and cuck-servatives will call you an extremist while those that feel as you do will call you a glow-nigger.

Why would you be labelled an extremist if you are merely advocating for protesting or anything that isn't illegal? Why would anyone consider you a glownigger if you're only advocating for legal activities?

Please explain

Because you don't make sense here, at all

...

[–] 0 pt

Keep trying you weak ass .gov bait while you fail to reply to direct statements like my comment about how your original statement is comically flawed. e.g. 1/6 protestors did none of the things you mention and were labeled terrorists and thrown in jail anyway.

But I tell you what, since I'm into charity, I'll play your game even though you can't hold up your end of the conversation. i.e. by replying to direct statements.

Lets try a real world application of my theory instead of your infantile straw man argument:

Had the truckers in Canada stood their ground when the police attacked them would they be instigating violence or practicing self defense?