What are trying to get at here, what are you trying to advocate for?
You are advocating for whites to start shooting libtards for morale or political reasons?
I mean, go ahead cross the line
I'm getting at this:
Someone makes a statement about "standing on principle" and some other cunt-fuck always tries to equate that with "shooting libtards" and calls to violence.
When you figure out who's the cunt-fuck in this scenario you'll have identified the cause of the problem with why the world is fucked.
Someone makes a statement about "standing on principle" and some other cunt-fuck always tries to equate that with "shooting libtards" and calls to violence.
Yeah of course, except you didn't make a statement about "standing on principle", you made a statement about "draw a line in the sand on principle", here https://poal.co/s/PoliticalMemes/525744/13ab3e22-d9a9-4820-b358-4090846a2600#cmnts
So, "standing on principle" as in what then? As in parading in the streets with signs?
Now about the so called "line in the sand", please be more explicit; when you say "draw a line in the sand on principle", what's on your mind exactly? Are you going to bring your shovel and a bucket and start building sand castles or some shit? Parading with signs maybe? Hm?
The problem no one is allowed to ever draw a line in the sand on principle. The left and cuck-servatives will call you an extremist while those that feel as you do will call you a glow-nigger.
Why would you be labelled an extremist if you are merely advocating for protesting or anything that isn't illegal? Why would anyone consider you a glownigger if you're only advocating for legal activities?
Please explain
Because you don't make sense here, at all
...
Keep trying you weak ass .gov bait while you fail to reply to direct statements like my comment about how your original statement is comically flawed. e.g. 1/6 protestors did none of the things you mention and were labeled terrorists and thrown in jail anyway.
But I tell you what, since I'm into charity, I'll play your game even though you can't hold up your end of the conversation. i.e. by replying to direct statements.
Lets try a real world application of my theory instead of your infantile straw man argument:
Had the truckers in Canada stood their ground when the police attacked them would they be instigating violence or practicing self defense?
(post is archived)