![I'm actually hearing this from the normies. It's rather sad. [1070x1363 - 88KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/Mkl9vL.jpg){kind=link}
I'd prefer a less drastic solution like ending all welfare. Even things people don't normally think of as welfare like the tax code.
Hopefully that would reduce how much they breed.
you can never outbreed a swarm of rats. and you need the rats for a lot of things. even 90% of whites are clinically retarded (see all those lib retards that believe in masks and all). I think the hamish have it 100% right. 1800 tech was all we ever needed to be happy. internet finally pushed the world in its shittiest form.
The Amish would stand no chance if attacked by anyone. They can only survive because they are surrounded by us. If they'd live next to the chinese, and had access to ressources, they'd be fucked.
No one who cripples their own survival can be 100% right.
I believe the world would in fact be a better place, if cultures that are technologically and culturally advanced would eliminate inferior cultures. The aztecs were wiped out, and arguably the world is a better place without their religion that involved sacrifing your own children. We still have cultures that mutilate children. Perhaps we should consider what would make the world a better place.
Instable cultures wipe themselves out they dont need any help. I think we should become more isolationist. I think it's a moral sin for one culture to transfer it's tech and resources to another. A form of the Prime directive if you into nerd garbage. Any way a more advanced culture cannot help a less advanced one. We aren't gods and any action we would take just amplifies any instability in the culture you would be trying to help more than likely causing more harm than doing nothing.
Wouldn't that lead to children starving?
Not my children
Do you have any children living in russia?
I ask, because implies that russian children starving should be a deterrence.
(post is archived)