Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

784

Mansplain if you must

Mansplain if you must

(post is archived)

[–] • 9 pts

The Immigration Act of 1790 America: "..citizenship is limited to Free White Men of good character." The Immigration Act of 1965: "...open our borders to any scumbag" Now look what we have.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

The Hart-Cellar act ended the United States and they knew it would. I especially hope Johnson is rotting in hell.

[–] • 9 pts

Is she truly that fucking stupid? Is the cunt unaware of the tenth fucking amendment? I don't believe it for a moment. Stop playing stupid to make all women look bad while trying to push an agenda you cunt.

[–] • 2 pts

No she's not. They learn this deception during the long walk through the institutions ... It bread and circus for the masses, useless eaters and npc's to have talking points around the water cooler.

[–] • 2 pts

What a sincere and heartfelt comment,spot on as well.Good eye,young Patriot.

[–] • 1 pt

I would not underestimate stupidity

I see lots of it lately

[–] [deleted] • 6 pts

She has a lot of documented health problems. May the reaper tap her on the shoulder soon.

[–] • 4 pts

After Biden's term.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

The next election will be stolen too.

[–] • 0 pt

Perhaps

[–] • 0 pt

An even worse demon would take her place.

[–] • 6 pts

How did we go from "The Congress shall have Power ... to regulate Commerce ... among the several States" to "if a company sells something in more than one state the Congress has the power to regulate any and everything that business does"?

The Constitution says Congress can regulate the commerce between states, not the people or businesses engaged in that commerce. That means they can regulate the conditions under which that commerce takes place. That is all.

[–] • 2 pts

How did we go from "The Congress shall have Power ... to regulate Commerce ... among the several States" to "if a company sells something in more than one state the Congress has the power to regulate any and everything that business does"?

Simple, women got the vote.

[–] • 3 pts

That quote is a little cherry-picked. The full passage was "So, if it's within the police power to protect the health and welfare of workers, you seem to be saying the states can do it, but you're saying the federal government can't even though it's facing the same crisis in interstate commerce that states are facing within their own borders. I -- I'm not sure I understand the distinction why the states would have the power but the federal government wouldn't."

(page 55 of https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2021/21a244_kifl.pdf)

[–] • 7 pts

Weak interstate commerce argument. Still sounds retarded.

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah, but is it within Police power to protect the health and welfare of workers ??, i mean SCOTUS have repeatedly ruled and reaffirmed it's not a constitutional duty for law enforcement to protect citizens - but workers ?? .... Meh, she is still way off course with finding a way to circumvent that pesky constitution thing ...

[–] • 1 pt

For the federal government? No, it's not within its power.

[–] • 3 pts

Fucking stupid obama beaner appointee.

[–] • 2 pts

We should club together to buy her more donuts. She looks half starved. Those arteries won't clog themselves!

[–] • 2 pts

The left are a cancer that needs to be removed before the entire earth becomes dead soil and air, chaos and carnage. The left thrives on pure insanity as liberalism is an extremely dangerous mental illness.

[–] • 1 pt

Looks like the Supreme Court didn't need a wide Latina after all.

[–] • 1 pt

Miss Quota Queen for a Day, herowndamnself.

Load more (2 replies)