Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

516

(post is archived)

[–] • 11 pts

Obviously to learn how to terrorize people. I'd say they're doing a pretty good job.

[–] [deleted] • 7 pts

And why would they be interested in terrorizing people? Adrenochome anyone?

[–] • 7 pts

People who are afraid are easily controlled... just look at them now!

Then imagine they get a special "vax" or operation that makes them even MORE easily scared. You could control the whole population as undisputed overlord just by saying "booh!".

[–] • 6 pts

I hate to be that guy, but we also share about 70% of our DNA with slugs, about 50% with bananas, 44% with bees, etc.

What I am trying to say is that humans are a lot more complex, so simply stating that we share x% amount of DNA with something doesn't necessarily mean that something can be applied to the same degree on humans.

But I could be wrong, maybe the same brain structure found in monkeys can be found in human, but then again, it might not work at the same degree.

[–] • 8 pts

When scientists experiment on monkeys it is because they are looking for the closest thing they can find to human without actually using a human. Monkeys are expensive... if they are being used it is a sure sign that the scientists are trying to develop some specific human application.

[–] • 1 pt

I understand that, I just think monkey are a bit overrated, for instance, parrots are the only animal capable of human speech, crows are one of the few animals capable of problem solving, dolphins have a sense of self awareness, pigs' organs are very similar in size and their skin is the closest to that of a human, the list goes on. My point is, if they wanted to test something on humans, they would, they have done so in the past, and they still do to this day, take China for example, just know that people on death row (In China) are not exactly seen as humans anymore. In fact, which country do you think is the biggest exporter of human organs?

[–] • 6 pts

parrots

no, they make parrot noises that sound like speech.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

As far as animals go, insert black joke here, you’re not going to get closer to humans in DNA - in a subject upon which research is practical - than rhesus macaques.

I’m not sure why anyone thinks we research on them because of “intelligence” or how parrots or crows or dolphins would be a better subject even if they were smarter.

That’s absurd.

And for as much as I love shitting on Fauci and garbage research in general, there could be many reasons why this research might be important, many applications that it could impact.

The fact that Candace doesn’t know what it is is irrelevant.

She is questioning it or condemning it and doesn’t even know if it’s medical, behavioral, psychological, pharmaceutical, she has no idea. Neither do I. And maybe it’s nefarious. Of course that’s a possibility. These people are evil and we all know that.

But she is somebody who frequently, and this isn’t unique on the right, sticks her foot firmly in her mouth when she speaks about things she doesn’t know about.

[–] • 1 pt

the people in prison are much less likely to experience fear to the same extent as regular people, therefore are not suitable for what based monkies post entails.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

Macaques are not expensive. At all. They sell for $10 American and that’s in the more touristy markets. They are tree rats. Labs don’t even obtain most of their monkeys legally. A quarter of them show up dead in boxes. They are treated like hamsters by gooks, as well they should be. They are awful creatures.

Of course that doesn’t mean that they don’t claim they obtain them legally and they are expensive. That’s what they claim. Completely and utterly false. And they certainly aren’t going to wait six months to import the little fuckers legally.

And most of these labs justify their experiments by claiming that their research has human applications. Do you think they are trying to hide that and we’ve discovered some secret? They literally justify their funding by claiming there are human applications. Otherwise what else are they are doing this for - researching cures for arthritis in parakeets? Coding?

What other group would benefit from this research? Martians?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Just use Australians.

They aren't called unquestioning compliance monkey's for nothing.

[–] • 1 pt

theres a big difference between 97 and 70 percent, namely that one barely has a brain.

most of that shared dna is for sexual reproduction and cell division, which occurs in 90 and 100 percent of all known life

[–] • 0 pt

If you want to be pedantic, we share 100% of DNA with apes, because we are (some of) them. She also started by talking about monkeys, then jumped to apes. Two stacked non sequiturs.

[–] • 0 pt

>we share 100% of DNA with apes

Yet a lion and a tigress that share about 95.6% of their DNA can interbreed and produce offpring. I would like you to show me a "humanzee".

[–] • 5 pts

Course she’s worried about apes.

[–] • 0 pt

That was my first thought!

She's mad cuz those were her cousins being experimented on.

[–] • 3 pts

Demons need to die.

[–] • 3 pts

Between this and the beagle story, my money's on adrenochrome harvesting research.

[–] • 2 pts

Only a soulless demon could think of such an experiment

[–] • 1 pt

Because they are evil evil jews. They want to find the best ways to inflict.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

It's the laboratory from the beginning of "28 Days Later."

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

It's in the jewserum they keep killing people with.

[–] • 0 pt

for those pesky micro chip resistors in the future

[–] • 0 pt

After i destroyed my sleep paralisys deamon, fear is a succulent treat.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Your comment is so lucid

Load more (1 reply)