If you think it could legally be done you have ZERO knowledge of how state (country) sovereignty works. A law inside country A can't make country B immune from liability. A suit between A and B wouldn't happen in either A or B's courts. It would happen in international jew courts.
still waiting on that source you said you had. again deflection. you post too many memes to fact check them all. I was curious and like I suspected you just regurgitate nonsense. so once more... pls provide the source you already claimed to have...
I mean, it is anticuck... so if he can't prove his point against you he'll just block you.
I mean why not prove the deniers wrong by just posting the part that says it? Why is that so hard?
‘‘(3) EXCEPTION.—Paragraphs (1) and (2) do not prohibit a covered financial institution from providing a correspondent account to a foreign bank, if the foreign bank— ‘‘(A) is an affiliate of a depository institution, credit union, or foreign bank that maintains a physical presence in the United States or a foreign country, as applicable; and ‘‘(B) is subject to supervision by a banking authority in the country regulating the affiliated depository institution, credit union, or fo
Get out of jail free card, when the bank is owned by US with Israeli partners. HSBC comes to mind
(post is archived)