!["The Elite" "The Establishment" "Bankers" "The 1%" "Globalists" "Marxists" "The Media" "Coporations" "Universalists" "Internationalists" "Politicians" "Lobbyists" "Pressure Group" "Masons" "Special Interests" "Foreign Assets" "Wall Street" [494x510 - 52KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/3p9NZM.jpg){kind=link}
The context is meaningless. The specificity of WHO is meaningful.
If you were to call a pest remover to help with something in your house and he asks you what the issue is. You don't say "pests" you tell him you have rats, or mice, or bats, or raccoons or whatever.
Stop arguing the point. You're wrong and you're trying to protect kikes.
How is what I've written protecting Kikes? Block me again for the same thing, you nutter.
how is not naming the jew protecting the jew
Okay. You're illiterate and stupid. Tyrone?
We've already argued about this.
You assert that failing to replace every possible instance of Freemason/ Bolshevik/ Banker/ whatever with "Jew" or "Kike", no matter the context of the discussion, equates to "not naming the Jew." That's fucking retarded. Asserting it over and over again is not going to win over anyone. Stop being so sensitive about it.
(post is archived)