![White IQ Bell Curve [640x418 - 32KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/KDtEXg.jpg){kind=link}
Yes. People certainly needed a politician who used to be a game show host to explain to us the government is corrupt. And then, while he’s in the big chair, make everything progressively worse for four years. Boy was that helpful. Awesome.
It was helpful in that it reminded white people that they didn't need to constantly apologise to the left.
Except Trump wasn't just a game show host. He turned down the Apprentice concept due to being too busy managing a company, until the producer came up with a concept where he could just pop in for a few minutes per episode.
So if Trump was an irrelevant nobody before that, why on earth would the producer of the TV show have wanted Trump's face on it to make the show successful?
You can't answer that question because in your revisionist history of the world, he was purely a game show host and never existed before that. You sure have a bit of a chicken and egg dilemma now, don't you?
If course once he got elected he was a disappointment. You totally misread the point I made. I said Trump's campaign catalyzed a change. If you understood what the word "catalyst" meant you'd see that your stock reply is 100% irrelevant to the point i made
(post is archived)