You will find that the people who form breakaway communities or go off-grid align far more with libertarianism than cuckservatism or natsoc or America First or whatever. Because getting things done starts with yourself and your relationship to the state and your community. The problem all these political ideologies have is that they're fighting to try to and take power and that is an unrealistic goal. Revolutions almost never happen organically. People who believe in reforming the state are a lost cause, and that includes most of the right, they just don't get it.

The only right wing community that seems to understand this are the neo-reactionaries, who themselves include many libertarians.

The main potential base of the libertarians is under-40 males disaffected with the right and eagerly buying preps like squirrels preparing for the piss-earth apocalypse while doing fuck all when they have the opportunity to change history, and bitter 20-30 something moderate leftwingers who gave up their radicalism in exchange for nihilism disguised as humor, like a tranny's dress returned to walmart after a night out on the town.

Thats libertatrianism in a nutshell. Small enough to be manageable for the state. Large enough to be a minor thorn in the state's side.

Build 50 parties, each with two or three issues they hold sacred, and use those to splinter the major parties, and then come talk about libertarianism.

Small but effective strategies are like bullets.

One is good. Having many variations of the same is better.

One makes a good example. Many makes a war or political campaign.

In that regard libertarians only serve as a good example: A good example of what would work if it was treated as a mass strategy, and a good example of what failure looks like from lack of people willing to organize and scale up.

Herein is fools gold. Maybe somebody will buy it. Maybe lots of people will buy it.

If theres anyone willing to sell it.